We have spent the last few
weeks of Museums Studies class going through everyone’s exhibit labels,
sentence by sentence, and editing. It is amazing how much time we have spent
editing 200 word paragraphs! We easily spend at least an hour on each. Why 200
words? From experience visiting museums, we all agreed (and I think most people
reading this article would concur) that if an exhibit label is too long, we
will skim it at best but most often skip over the label all together. There are
studies to prove this, saying that when exhibit labels are over 200 words
visitors start to skim.[1]
So if we want our visitors to fully grasp the meaning of each label, we need to
pick our words wisely and keep it short and sweet. Thus, we have spent a
comically long amount of time this semester analyzing the difference between
“institution”, “college”, and “university” and debating whether the word tense
should be “strive”, “striven”, or “strove”.
This week our task is to read through our labels sequentially and assess them
as a coherent whole. This is especially important since each label was written
independently and we need to make sure they make sense as a whole. This
includes reading for flow from object to object, appropriate tone, and clear
themes. This will probably take us more time than the two hours we have
allotted for class this week but the results should be worth the extra
out-of-class time.
[1] Beverly Serrell, Exhibit Labels: An Interpretive Approach (Latham, MD: AltaMira Press, 1996): 127
No comments:
Post a Comment